|
Fluency: Part 3: Background Information
The following information is from the National Institute for Literacy’s
Put Reading First web pages http://www.nifl.gov/partnershipforreading/publications/reading_first1fluency.html.
Fluency is the ability to read a text accurately and quickly. When
fluent readers read silently, they recognize words automatically.
They group words quickly to help them gain meaning from what they
read. Fluent readers read aloud effortlessly and with expression.
Their reading sounds natural, as if they are speaking. Readers who
have not yet developed fluency read slowly, word by word. Their
oral reading is choppy and plodding.
Fluency is important because it provides a bridge between word recognition
and comprehension. Because fluent readers do not have to concentrate
on decoding the words, they can focus their attention on what the
text means. They can make connections among the ideas in the text
and between the text and their background knowledge. In other words,
fluent readers recognize words and comprehend at the same time.
Less fluent readers, however, must focus their attention on figuring
out the words, leaving them little attention for understanding the
text.
More fluent readers focus their attention on making connections
among the ideas in a text and between these ideas and their background
knowledge. Therefore, they are able to focus on comprehension.
Less fluent readers must focus their attention primarily on decoding
individual words. Therefore, they have little attention left for
comprehending the text.
Fluency develops gradually over considerable time and through substantial
practice. At the earliest stage of reading development, students'
oral reading is slow and labored because students are just learning
to "break the code"—to attach sounds to letters
and to blend letter sounds into recognizable words.
Even when students recognize many words automatically, their oral
reading still may be expressionless, not fluent. To read with expression,
readers must be able to divide the text into meaningful chunks.
These chunks include phrases and clauses. Readers must know to pause
appropriately within and at the ends of sentences and when to change
emphasis and tone. For example, a reader who lacks fluency may read,
probably in a monotone, a line from Bill Martin Jr.'s Brown Bear,
Brown Bear as if it were a list of words rather than a connected
text, pausing at inappropriate places:
Brown/ bear brown/ bear what/ do/you see.
A fluent reader will read the same line as:
Brown bear/Brown bear/What do you see?/
Fluency is not a stage of development at which readers can read
all words quickly and easily. Fluency changes, depending on what
readers are reading, their familiarity with the words, and the amount
of their practice with reading text. Even very skilled readers may
read in a slow, labored manner when reading texts with many unfamiliar
words or topics. For example, readers who are usually fluent may
not be able to read technical material fluently, such as a textbook
about nuclear physics or an article in a medical journal.
A recent large-scale study by the National Assessment of Educational
Progress (NAEP) found that 44% of a representative sample of the
nation's fourth graders were low in fluency. The study also found
a close relationship between fluency and reading comprehension.
Students who scored lower on measures of fluency also scored lower
on measures of comprehension, suggesting that fluency is a neglected
reading skill in many American classrooms, affecting many students'
reading comprehension.
Although some readers may recognize words automatically in isolation
or on a list, they may not read the same words fluently when the
words appear in sentences in connected text. Instant or automatic
word recognition is a necessary, but not sufficient, reading skill.
Students who can read words in isolation quickly may not be able
to automatically transfer this "speed and accuracy." It
is important to provide students with instruction and practice in
fluency as they read connected text.
What does scientifically-based research tell us about fluency
instruction?
Researchers have investigated two major instructional approaches
related to fluency. In the first approach, repeated and monitored
oral reading (commonly called "repeated reading"), students
read passages aloud several times and receive guidance and feedback
from the teacher. In the second approach, independent silent reading,
students are encouraged to read extensively on their own. Key findings
from the scientific research on fluency instruction include the
following conclusions about these two approaches that are of particular
interest and value to classroom teachers.
Repeated and monitored oral reading improves reading fluency
and overall reading achievement.
Students who read and reread passages orally as they receive guidance
and/or feedback become better readers. Repeated oral reading substantially
improves word recognition, speed, and accuracy as well as fluency.
To a lesser but still considerable extent, repeated oral reading
also improves reading comprehension. Repeated oral reading improves
the reading ability of all students throughout the elementary school
years. It also helps struggling readers at higher grade levels.
Traditionally, many teachers have relied primarily on round-robin
reading to develop oral fluency. In round-robin reading, students
take turns reading parts of a text aloud (though usually not repeatedly).
But round-robin reading in itself does not increase fluency. This
may be because students only read small amounts of text, and they
usually read this small portion only once.
Researchers have found several effective techniques related to repeated
oral reading:
• students read and reread a text a certain number of times
or until a certain level of fluency is reached. Four rereadings
are sufficient for most students; and
• oral reading practice is increased through the use of audiotapes,
tutors, peer guidance, or other means.
In addition, some effective repeated oral reading techniques have
carefully designed feedback to guide the reader's performance.
The difference between fluency and automaticity
Although the terms automaticity and fluency often are used interchangeably,
they are not the same thing.
Automaticity is the fast, effortless word recognition that comes
with a great deal of reading practice. In the early stages of learning
to read, readers may be accurate but slow and inefficient at recognizing
words. Continued reading practice helps word recognition become
more automatic, rapid, and effortless. Automaticity refers only
to accurate, speedy word recognition, not to reading with expression.
Therefore, automaticity (or automatic word recognition) is necessary,
but not sufficient, for fluency.
No research evidence is available currently to confirm that
instructional time spent on silent, independent reading with minimal
guidance and feedback improves reading fluency and overall reading
achievement.
One of the major differences between good and poor readers is the
amount of time they spend reading. Many studies have found a strong
relationship between reading ability and how much a student reads.
On the basis of this evidence, teachers have long been encouraged
to promote voluntary reading in the classroom. Teacher-education
and reading-education literature often recommends in-class procedures
for encouraging students to read on their own, such as Silent Sustained
Reading (SSR) or Drop Everything and Read (DEAR).
Research, however, has not yet confirmed whether independent silent
reading with minimal guidance or feedback improves reading achievement
and fluency. Neither has it proven that more silent reading in the
classroom cannot work; its effectiveness without guidance or feedback
is as yet unproven. The research suggests that there are more beneficial
ways to spend reading instructional time than to have students read
independently in the classroom without reading instruction.
What should I do about silent, independent reading in the
classroom?
Reading fluency growth is greatest when students are working directly
with you. Therefore, you should use most of your allocated reading
instruction time for direct teaching of reading skills and strategies.
Although silent, independent reading may be a way to increase fluency
and reading achievement, it should not be used in place of direct
instruction in reading.
Direct instruction is especially important for readers who are struggling.
Readers who have not yet attained fluency are not likely to make
effective and efficient use of silent, independent reading time.
For these students, independent reading takes time away from needed
reading instruction.
Rather than allocating instructional time for independent reading
in the classroom, encourage your students to read more outside of
school. They can read with an adult or other family member. Or,
they can read on their own with books at their independent reading
level. Of course, students might also read on their own during independent
work time in the classroom--for example, as another small group
is receiving reading instruction, or after they have completed one
activity and are waiting for a new activity to begin.
When should fluency instruction begin? When should it end?
Fluency instruction is useful when students are not automatic at
recognizing the words in their texts. How can you tell when students
are not automatic? There is a strong indication that a student needs
fluency instruction:
• if you ask the student to read orally from a text that he
or she has not practiced; and the student makes more than ten percent
word recognition errors;
• if the student cannot read orally with expression; or
• if the student's comprehension is poor for the text that
she or he reads orally.
Is increasing word recognition skills sufficient for developing
fluency?
Isolated word recognition is a necessary but not sufficient condition
for fluent reading. Throughout much of the twentieth century, it
was widely assumed that fluency was the result of word recognition
proficiency. Instruction, therefore, focused primarily on the development
of word recognition. In recent years, however, research has shown
that fluency is a separate component of reading that can be developed
through instruction.
Having students review and rehearse word lists (for example, by
using flash cards) may improve their ability to recognize the words
in isolation, but this ability may not transfer to words presented
in actual texts. Developing reading fluency in texts must be developed
systematically.
Summing up:
• Fluency is the ability to read a text accurately and quickly.
• Fluency is important because it frees students to understand
what they read.
• Reading fluency can be developed by modeling fluent reading
and by having students engage in repeated oral reading.
• Monitoring student progress in reading fluency is useful
in evaluating instruction and setting instructional goals can be
motivating to students.
|